Because it makes all the difference on a car that can do 110 (mph) absolutely flat out. Why the need for such accuracy?
I do wonder whether people on here actually DRIVE their cars, or just sit and stroke them.
Wasn't necessarily directing my comments directly at him, but my point still stands. It's hardly a fast car, so you have to be a right effing chump to get yourself into any trouble.
I can theoretically get a ticket at 3km/h over. The TA makes peak torque right around cruising speed so it's easier to speed than some of the big turbo cars I've owned where nothing happens before 4000rpm. We're not talking about being caught going 40+ over. If I'm going 40 over, then I don't need no stupid dial to tell me.
Why the need for such accuracy? It's a single value in the ECU code, why not?
Perhaps it's my German blood, if the v
erkehrsschild says 60, I want to be going exactly 60. Any faster is illegal, any slower is well, slower...
Can't see the issue, if sticking to indicated speed on the speedo you'llbe completely safe with camera, with a slight margin for error on your part of going slightly over the indicated limit.
Easy solution: don't speed.
This must be the first car forum I've been to with next to no car enthusiasts on it.
Why on earth would I willingly drive 90 in a 100 zone?
Is it for the honking and tail gating or just to be an ass in peak hour? This sort of BS is why we have congestion, it only takes one car out of hundreds to be 'doing the limit' based on some random number generator for the crocodile to stretch back past the horizon.
The speedo error itself wouldn't bother me that much if the needle didn't cover 5km/h of the very markings I want to see. Add it up, and it's a crap shoot.