Horrible great lump. Just becasue it says Panda on the side deosnt mean its a Panda. I wonder how much the fancy colours add to the price too.
I seem to remember similar disdain when the 169 was introduced, it being so different to the original Panda.
That had extensive guidance about each and every material and how it could be recycled.. and yet, we have scrap yards of cars sitting out, rotting in big yards... and then eventually just crushed into a cube. Seems wasteful to me.
Legislation demands that every plastic part must be labelled, to enable easier recycling, and much of it is. Sadly, recyling plastic is often more expensive than making new, and the quality deteriorates each time. Your airbox and wing liners will most likely be recycled, as will similar black unimportant stuff, like fusebox covers and heater boxes.
EVs are surely worse... the batteries simply aren't recyclable or repairable and the lithium is a rare earth mineral. I'm not sure there's enough lithium on the planet to cater for every vehicle on the road in the UK to be replaced... let alone globally, for centuries to come...
There was a report by the mining industry a year or so ago, that suggesed that if we could mine every last gram of lithium, and use it only for passenger cars, we'd have enough for half the current world car population. But we also need it for our phones, power tolls, torches, hearing aids, etc.
As we currently don't have a method for recycling the lithium, it is all single use. EVs may be the car of the future, but it is only a short lifespan, then oops, nothing.
I've read that about 20,000 tonnes of earth needs to be shifted, for each EV battery. All mined and processed with diesel machinery. The CO2 footprint of a new EV is horrendous. Until they reach 70k miles, they are not green at all.
As said, the benefit is emissions at the tailpipe. Hybrids, used in EV mode in town centres, is a better way forward.