Hmmm. I wonder what the folks who drove cars
without seatbelts or airbags who aren't still alive would say about this?

.
I would agree with all that you have said but there are exceptions in the case of airbags...
My sister is of a small stature (5ft 0.5inch) and has to put the seat up close to the steering wheel.
It would appear that in her case she would be better off
not having the airbag on her side as a driver. An airbag should be at
least 10 inchs away from you and in her case she's practically sitting on the wheel of her 'safe' Suzuki Grand Vitara. I would think that she would be better off with pedal extensions to get further back or drive a smaller car.
Looking at some statistics there is a 30% reduction in fatality having an airbag installed but some studies have been carried out where you can be
worse off with an airbag but it is more in low speed collisions where the airbag is deployed when it didn't need to be. (
full report).
The single most important safety feature is the seat belt and is more effective than the airbag (one example comes to mind where there was 1 survivor out of 4). There was an assumption
at one time that having a airbag as a sole occupant didn't necessitate the use of a seatbelt. This wasn't correct since no account was being made of non-frontal collisions.
Another area to be wary of is buying cars that have been in collisions and have had airbag replacements done. These need to checked by an expert. In a US study what was found was that
one in 25 didn't work.
On a recent posting a reference was made about airbag theft - that reference article also refers to airbags as being the 2nd most stolen item out of a car (US study).
So in conclusion if you driving around in a classic car (at low speed) and you're of small stature, not having an airbag may not as dangerous as one would be led to believe.
And for those with airbags
maybe an alarm isn't a bad idea after all.:idea: