- Joined
- Feb 16, 2005
- Messages
- 5,983
- Points
- 988
I'd also have love to done the 1.4 with aftermarket ECU but cost and availability are an issue.
I paid £350 for my engine, and mk1 manifold and ECU but to be honest I think I got a raw deal. I was meant to be getting a low milage Punto engine, but they said the Bravo was the only one with the cam sensor, so I took that. Looking around though, the bravo versions are a LOT cheaper
Should have held off abd researched a bit more.
The price your quoted seems a bit high, I'd haggle a bit more, but it depends on condition, miles, and extras tbh.
I see two easy choices to make, keep the 1.1 ECu and map it (it requires no modifications and will just mate with the 16v engine) OR move over to aftermarket ECU.
Using the 1.2 ECU will be a pain. If its a new ECU, its not too bad, as it will mate with your code box and keys and work ok, but then it needs dealer setup for TPS etc.
If you get a used 1.2 ECU, it will be paired with the code box/keys/locks of the donor car, so you need to swap it all over. Of course the locks won't fit, so you need to cut the chips out the donor keys and fit them into your keys, also fit the donor code box, and possibly split the looms together as I'm not sure if the internal loom mates directly with the 1.2 ecu.
Third option is to get a used 1.2 ECU and get www.codeman.co.uk to make it a virgin ECU again, to pair with your current keys and code box. but that costs as well.
At the end of the day though, after a few choice mods like exhausts, induction etc, you'll be looking at a remap for best performance anyway!
Therefore the only logical choices I see are use existing ecu, OR aftermarket ECU, thats my plan for later but a few hundred on a RR will be cheaper for now
There is an extra issue here though, the cinq ECU is not as advanced as the latest Sei ones. I have cam sensor and knock sensor. You can prob do without cam sensor, but knock sensor will give you more power as the ECU can detect detonation. Running a 1.2 16V without knock sensor may not be a wise move.
Therefore you may be better taking the two routes mentioed above, RATHER than my route which is most convinient for me.
hope that all helps
Kristian
I paid £350 for my engine, and mk1 manifold and ECU but to be honest I think I got a raw deal. I was meant to be getting a low milage Punto engine, but they said the Bravo was the only one with the cam sensor, so I took that. Looking around though, the bravo versions are a LOT cheaper
The price your quoted seems a bit high, I'd haggle a bit more, but it depends on condition, miles, and extras tbh.
I see two easy choices to make, keep the 1.1 ECu and map it (it requires no modifications and will just mate with the 16v engine) OR move over to aftermarket ECU.
Using the 1.2 ECU will be a pain. If its a new ECU, its not too bad, as it will mate with your code box and keys and work ok, but then it needs dealer setup for TPS etc.
If you get a used 1.2 ECU, it will be paired with the code box/keys/locks of the donor car, so you need to swap it all over. Of course the locks won't fit, so you need to cut the chips out the donor keys and fit them into your keys, also fit the donor code box, and possibly split the looms together as I'm not sure if the internal loom mates directly with the 1.2 ecu.
Third option is to get a used 1.2 ECU and get www.codeman.co.uk to make it a virgin ECU again, to pair with your current keys and code box. but that costs as well.
At the end of the day though, after a few choice mods like exhausts, induction etc, you'll be looking at a remap for best performance anyway!
Therefore the only logical choices I see are use existing ecu, OR aftermarket ECU, thats my plan for later but a few hundred on a RR will be cheaper for now
There is an extra issue here though, the cinq ECU is not as advanced as the latest Sei ones. I have cam sensor and knock sensor. You can prob do without cam sensor, but knock sensor will give you more power as the ECU can detect detonation. Running a 1.2 16V without knock sensor may not be a wise move.
Therefore you may be better taking the two routes mentioed above, RATHER than my route which is most convinient for me.
hope that all helps
Kristian