Technical adjustments

[the green vanper]

no, i didn't have this backup, i even don't know how save it

MultiECUScan - Backup Proxi file on MES

This thread is for the general discussion of the Guide Backup Proxi file on MES. Please add to the discussion here. theoneandonly submitted a new guide: Backup Proxi file on MES To save a copy of your proxi file (before you start changing things that need a proxi alignment) These example...

www.fiatforum.com

 

[RBibegon]

MultiECUScan - Backup Proxi file on MES

This thread is for the general discussion of the Guide Backup Proxi file on MES. Please add to the discussion here. theoneandonly submitted a new guide: Backup Proxi file on MES To save a copy of your proxi file (before you start changing things that need a proxi alignment) These example...

www.fiatforum.com

Unfortunately, I no longer have it, I didn't even know it could be saved..

 

[RBibegon]

Maybe the configuration of my robot has reset?

 

[the green vanper]

Maybe the configuration of my robot has reset?

Yes, that is possible. I fixed my ECU errors in such way

But it should be back to default config, which should work on the car. It has not been zero'ed. Unless it's damaged.

 

[RBibegon]

Yes, that is possible. I fixed my ECU errors in such way

But it should be back to default config, which should work on the car. It has not been zero'ed. Unless it's damaged.

If I understand correctly, it is completely intact. The question is how to return to the standard configuration?

 

[the green vanper]

I had some errors on the methane ECU. I disconnected the ECU for like half an hour to inspect the connectors and clean around. When I connected the ECU again the errors were gone and they have not reappeared since. Until the engine was flooded again with water from the shitty scuttle tray.

But in the meantime overall cleaning of the engine bay was done, so could be pure coincidence.

 

[RBibegon]

Hello again! At the moment, I have restored the menu completely, and I managed to make the proxy work, everything went smoothly. The only remaining issue is that I can't see which gear the car is in; it doesn't show on the display.

 

[the green vanper]

Great, one step forward.

Is that a new screenshot? or the old one?

 

[RBibegon]

Great, one step forward.

Is that a new screenshot? or the old one?

It's new.....

 

[the green vanper]

So those are the same errors that you had in December. And same low battery voltage.

 

[RBibegon]

So those are the same errors that you had in December. And same low battery voltage.

Yes, these are the same problems that remain. It's interesting that it shows an error for the temperature, yet it detects that it is 28 degrees. The low voltage is because the car is not started, and even when I kept it connected to the charger, nothing changed.

 

[the green vanper]

Perhaps that's a minimum reading for the sensor. It's not the external temperature, but the gearbox oil temperature sensor.

Can you measure the voltage on the battery. Because if it's different, perhaps that could be a clue.

 

[RBibegon]

Perhaps that's a minimum reading for the sensor. It's not the external temperature, but the gearbox oil temperature sensor.

Can you measure the voltage on the battery. Because if it's different, perhaps that could be a clue.

I can't figure out where this temperature sensor is located.
Yes, I can measure the voltage on the battery, but it's not that important because it was connected to the network, and the voltage was normal. I'm not talking about that time when it was 10v

 

[the green vanper]

The sensor can be inside the gearbox.

What I was thinking about is that perhaps the BCM is damaged and shows strange values. Could be an internal error or a connector problem.

I find it strange that voltage, temperature and three errors are still the same a month or two later. And despite the errors you've managed to do the proxi alignment.

 

[RBibegon]

The sensor can be inside the gearbox.

What I was thinking about is that perhaps the BCM is damaged and shows strange values. Could be an internal error or a connector problem.

I find it strange that voltage, temperature and three errors are still the same a month or two later. And despite the errors you've managed to do the proxi alignment.

I have already replaced the BCM with a similar one, though not new, and the situation remained the same. I recently reviewed old photos of these errors, and yes, the temperature was consistently recorded as 28.8 degrees. Should I check while the engine is running?

 

[the green vanper]

I'm not sure if a proxi alignment shouldn't be done after swapping the BCM.

Should I check while the engine is running?

Definitely go for it!

 

[RBibegon]

Here I took a picture of the robot module, it's impossible to get it here, maybe someone can help me get one?

 

[electric73]

fig6 show the matrix display. You do not have it so you can try the others display options from list.View attachment 457585

so, if have the display on fig 5 cannot change it with mes to fig 6? Unless if changing the whole speedometer unit, correct?

 

[the green vanper]

so, if have the display on fig 5 cannot change it with mes to fig 6? Unless if changing the whole speedometer unit, correct?

No, you can't. The hardware is different.

I'm not even sure if it's an easy swap for the speedometer unit, as it certainly holds some data from the car, which could be unconsistent with the data hold in the BCM.

 

[electric73]

its possible with proxy. Just thought that display style is a software job, which seems wrong