Toyota Celica - Am I missing something?

Currently reading:
Toyota Celica - Am I missing something?

Joined
May 31, 2005
Messages
2,010
Points
450
Location
Northampton
(The newer type)

Its just that they seem slow. And a bit unimpressive for their cost.

They look IMO fantastic, but they just seem to cost a lot more than similar coupes (Hyundai V6 being the closest find)

And a 8.0 second sprint to 60? My car can do that!
 
remember the celica isnt a true sports coupe, its an exec coupe (or grande tourer), the kind of car that is far more likely to be a company car than an enthusiasts car.

it isnt designed for performance and handling, and you can tell. its good, but compared to the sports coupe market segment its lacking in both performance and handling. that doesnt matter in the case of celica because the target market arent people who want the best drive. as parkers put it- "A car for the driver who wants to cruise quickly and reliably in relaxing style."

if you want a sporty coupe dont consider a celica, they were never designed for that and you'll be disappointed. if you want a hassle free grande tourer for a relaxing comfortable motorway cruise then this is an excellent choice. the build quality is excellent, the reliablity it proven, depriciation is slow, the dealer network is excellent. bascially its an old man's wet dream, but thats very different to what I want, i dont know about you.
 
I dont want one, just looked at prices and they are still fetching 10k for 2001 plates.

At the moment (anyone who knows me will know how much this changes!) I wouldnt mind a Seat Ibiza TDi 130 sport. Remapped to 170 :yum:
 
Is it true the Celica has the same engine as a Camry?

they definately used to, not sure if the latest range do.

the camry never really sold in the uk (import only), i miss them, they're great cars, although the 2008 model looks very ugly.
 
Last edited:
makinenn type celica yes, them new box's on wheels with a weedy 1.8 NA, no thanks.

camry's, erm, I like the 80's ones, but fraid for my 'turn of the 90's exec jap saloon' cateogory a bright red Honda accord 2.2vtec with extra chrome and exec pack is where its at. so so so nearly bought a MINTY (less than 40k on it) h reg example in aformentioned spec from an elderly couple who bought a new civic type S for a few hundred squid. in the end they traded it in and its thought the honda dealer ordered it crushed.
bar stuards, it was the best honda I've ever seen/known of :(

newer camry's, erm, well in peoples rebulic of kazahkstan they think they are 'special persons' machina/car. the 2.2 selling/appearing everywhere. I'm not so sure about them, they used to have some flare and style, now they are just the std run of the mill jap saloon box/brown with bits of brown with a brown dash and brown wheel trim type box/saloon thing with rounded corners and differnet headlights everyyear, like all the otehr jap cars that look the same (n)

in the west we're lucky we get jap cars with style that you can tell what each one is, in asian and US markets they all look exactly the same, but with different badges/headlights to distinguish the lexus model from the toyota/honda/nissan/dai/ssyyanngyong counterparts
 
my brothers got one of the mid/late 90's ones though it's only the 1.8 but he's in america and it also has completely blacked out windows etc lol. but he say's it's the most comfortable car he's driven. he wasn't impressed by the focus he had in germany though and reckons it's quicker than that (1.6) and he says the handling is much better. but as Jug say's compared to proper coupes/sports cars its nothing. but my brother still would prefer a triumph Tr7 as he drove my uncles one (when he had it but not for long like most of his cars) when he was 17 down private country roads.
 
I owned a Celica last year - I think it was the ST183. It was a Japanese Domestic Market (JDM) 1990 GT-R model, with the old 3SGE 2 litre motor rated at an impressive 166bhp, four wheel steer, black metallic with the pop-up lights. And the price of all this? $500 (under 180 pounds).

Was it a great car? Yes, for the reasons mentioned by jug: super-reliable, well-equipped, even the original air conditioning worked brilliantly. The interior was made of some grey super-velour that seemed to last indefinitely. It is fair to point out the comfort already mentioned - definitely better than average, with the seat being width-adjustable as well as tilt, height, and lumbar, all electric. Sunroof as well, and airbag.

And no - for me, as my first Japanese car, I found it pretty much as I expected: anonymous, anodyne looks, lacklustre performance (166bhp? more like 90bhp!), nasty (lazy, slippy) Japanese automatic transmission behaviour, not very economical, a not-very-practical body style. My favourite feature was the 'Automatic Drive' (cruise control) that got you to where you were going with a minimum of interaction with this not-very-much-a-driver's-car. :) I also had difficulty spotting it in the carpark and nearly got into an identical model one day, parked three spaces away.

Worth noting that the 5th-gen 1990-1996 Celica (like mine) rated first in the JD Power Used Car Reliability Survey 2003.

I sold it for $2000 after a few hundred dollars of renovation work. So, it was excellent value for me, and the next owner seemed to enjoy it. My advice is that the Celica is an excellent choice for someone who doesn't work on cars themselves, doesn't really care about cars in general, and wants to run an older vehicle for reasons of cost saving.

-Alex
 
Last edited:
my friend had a carlos sainz celica gt4 think it was st185. really nice but had a drinking problem :D

DSC00381.JPG
 
Key is low depreciation, when you get your leasing quote for the company car you will drive for the next 3 years the best deals will be Mercs and Japs for this reason. Taxing peeps on carbon emissions is designed to push "how thirsty?" up the questions list.
 
Back
Top