Greet from Slovakia.
In January, I bought a new Panda Sport 1.0 hybrid to commute to work and I bought a Fiat 500 1.0 hybrid to my wife. I have driven more than 3500 km with a panda so far, I am relatively satisfied with her driving performance. Fiat 500 has more than 2000km.
But my wife and I agreed that the engine in the Fiat 500 1.0 Hybrid is significantly more agile, easier to pick up from low revs. Above 4000 rpm, both cars are running the same (but it is true if I say that above 4000 rpm those engines are weak). Both cars have the same size and tire model, they have the same equipment, so the weight differences are minimal.
But I noticed that the airbox in Panda has a slightly different shape than the 500. Can this difference be the subjective difference? The hybrid system recharges the battery under the seat in both cars in the same way. I enclose a photo of the airboxes.
In January, I bought a new Panda Sport 1.0 hybrid to commute to work and I bought a Fiat 500 1.0 hybrid to my wife. I have driven more than 3500 km with a panda so far, I am relatively satisfied with her driving performance. Fiat 500 has more than 2000km.
But my wife and I agreed that the engine in the Fiat 500 1.0 Hybrid is significantly more agile, easier to pick up from low revs. Above 4000 rpm, both cars are running the same (but it is true if I say that above 4000 rpm those engines are weak). Both cars have the same size and tire model, they have the same equipment, so the weight differences are minimal.
But I noticed that the airbox in Panda has a slightly different shape than the 500. Can this difference be the subjective difference? The hybrid system recharges the battery under the seat in both cars in the same way. I enclose a photo of the airboxes.