It is a tough call (if not now soon will be) for us bods that like to maintain and service our own vehicles as to what, how and at what expense we are going to have to endure to carry on as we do.
Fortunately our 130TC is old school with no diagnostics or computers at all, and Barchetta and 500X are EOBD with no encryption. However time will be the killer as these will not last forever and even if they do we may find in the future that clean air zones bar them from useful/quality/pratical use. But that is in the future and not quite around the corner yet thank goodness. Besides for us old farts (60+) our ability to take on big jobs is declining. I remember the days when a 185/60 R13 was considered a large tyre and were dead easy to handle. The 500X is 225/45 R18 and they are heavy wheels to handle so just bleeding the brakes without a vehicle hoist is a hard task on old bodies.
I suspect the motor industry can't wait to get all this encryption into their vehicles as it will become a real money spinner for them.
Slightly of topic but yet again politicians, insurance companies, have gone overboard. I have no problem with encryption for security functions (locks/keys, immobilisers, forced engine starting etc. and they could have limited/ring fenced in just those functions. Instead the whole blinking EOBD system has been targeted.
The EU have a report/paper on "Access to In-Vehicle Data and Resources"
https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transport/files/2017-05-access-to-in-vehicle-data-and-resources.pdf
And here is some information about CAN encryption
https://www.cancrypt.eu/index.php/en/
Exactly how it should be
Key coding/immobiliser as well as things like changing millage should be encrypted
Basic diagnosis and sensor reading should be open to all