plane misses runway at Heathrow

Currently reading:
plane misses runway at Heathrow

Theres always the possibility that it was a severe case of chinese big bird flu!:shakehead:
If it was geese flying into the engines then i blame Jamie oliver & him promoting all this free range stuff!:yuck:



Sorry!, i'll get my coat!:D

TAXI for Pickle....
 
It couldve been a pilot error!:eek:
Apparently, the captain goes around with his head in the clouds!:ROFLMAO:


We can all joke about this as at the end of the day it was only a machine that was damaged, and not a life.....
but on the other hand there were peoples lifes and familys on board, and it could have been a huge loss of life, so really not all that funny...

im sure i will get some nasty comments back, but oooh well...
 
Laughter is the best medicene of all!
If people had been killed or seriously injured i wouldnt joke about it!(y)
 
so it was the co-pilot at the controls when it was landing.

captain and crew just did a press conference, revealed nothing about what happened though.
 
hehe. on topic though;

Accident to Boeing 777-236, G-YMMM at London Heathrow Airport on 17 January 2008 - Initial Report


Initial Report AAIB Ref: EW/C2008/01/01

Accident
Aircraft Type and Registration: Boeing 777-236, G-YMMM
No & Type of Engines: 2 Rolls-Royce RB211 Trent 895-17 turbofan engines
Year of Manufacture: 2001
Date & Time: 17 January 2008 at 1243 hrs
Location: Undershoot RWY 27L, London Heathrow Airport
Type of Flight: Commercial Air Transport (passenger)
Persons on Board: Crew - 16
Passengers - 136
Injuries: Crew - 4 (minor)
Passengers - 1 (serious)
Passengers - 8 (minor)
Nature of Damage: Substantial
Information Source: AAIB Field Investigation

Following an uneventful flight from Beijing, China, the aircraft was established on an ILS approach to Runway 27L at London Heathrow. Initially the approach progressed normally, with the Autopilot and Autothrottle engaged, until the aircraft was at a height of approximately 600 ft and 2 miles from touch down. The aircraft then descended rapidly and struck the ground, some 1,000 ft short of the paved runway surface, just inside the airfield boundary fence. The aircraft stopped on the very beginning of the paved surface of Runway 27L. During the short ground roll the right main landing gear separated from the wing and the left main landing gear was pushed up through the wing root. A significant amount of fuel leaked from the aircraft but there was no fire. An emergency evacuation via the slides was supervised by the cabin crew and all occupants left the aircraft, some receiving minor injuries.

The AAIB was notified of the accident within a few minutes and a team of Inspectors including engineers, pilots and a flight recorder specialist deployed to Heathrow. In accordance with the established international arrangements the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) of the USA, representing the State of Design and Manufacture of the aircraft, was informed of the event. The NTSB appointed an Accredited Representative to lead a team from the USA made up of investigators from the NTSB, the FAA and Boeing. A Boeing investigator already in the UK joined the investigation on the evening of the event, the remainder of the team arrived in the UK on Friday 18th January. Rolls-Royce, the engine manufacturer is also supporting the investigation, an investigator having joined the AAIB team.

Activity at the accident scene was coordinated with the Airport Fire and Rescue Service, the Police, the British Airports Authority and British Airways to ensure the recovery of all relevant evidence, to facilitate the removal of the aircraft and the reinstatement of airport operations.

The flight crew were interviewed on the evening of the event by an AAIB Operations Inspector and the Flight Data Recorder (FDR), Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) and Quick Access Recorder (QAR) were removed for replay. The CVR and FDR have been successfully downloaded at the AAIB laboratories at Farnborough and both records cover the critical final stages of the flight. The QAR was downloaded with the assistance of British Airways and the equipment manufacturer. All of the downloaded information is now the subject of detailed analysis.

Examination of the aircraft systems and engines is ongoing.

Initial indications from the interviews and Flight Recorder analyses show the flight and approach to have progressed normally until the aircraft was established on late finals for Runway 27L. At approximately 600 ft and 2 miles from touch down, the Autothrottle demanded an increase in thrust from the two engines but the engines did not respond. Following further demands for increased thrust from the Autothrottle, and subsequently the flight crew moving the throttle levers, the engines similarly failed to respond. The aircraft speed reduced and the aircraft descended onto the grass short of the paved runway surface.

The investigation is now focussed on more detailed analysis of the Flight Recorder information, collecting further recorded information from various system modules and examining the range of aircraft systems that could influence engine operation.

http://www.aaib.dft.gov.uk/latest_news/accident__heathrow_17_january_2008___initial_report.cfm
 
Apparently just before the BA Boeing 777 left China, two men dressed in pilot's uniforms walked up the aisle of the plane. Both are wearing dark glasses, one was using a guide dog, and the other tapped his way along the aisle with a cane.

Nervous laughter spread through the cabin, but the men entered the cockpit, the door closed, and the engines started up. The passengers seemed a bit nervous and begin glancing around, searching for some sign that this is just a little practical joke. None was forthcoming. The plane took off OK so everyone relaxed, until they approached Heathrow for landing that is. The plane moved closer and closer to the ground on approach, barely skimming the taxis on the M4, and flying faster and faster as it approached Hatton Cross. The people sitting in the window seats realize they're falling short and might not reach the runway, and as it begins to look as though the plane will plough into ground on the approach, panicked screams fill the cabin.

At that moment, the plane lifts and glides onto the grass at the end of the runway, snapping the undercarriage off like matchsticks. The cabin crew throw the doors open and the passengers flee from the aircraft.

In the cockpit, one of the blind pilots turns to the other and says, "You know, Bob, one of these days, they're gonna scream too late and we're all gonna die".

:chin: am sure thats an old joke adapted to fit
 
"I think about the crash every day and wish it had never happened to me."

state the obvious.... dont we all think that when were in an accident :rolleyes:

and i was just a noob when this thread was started :eek:
 
"I think about the crash every day and wish it had never happened to me."

but the money will help:confused:....unless getting blind drunk for a few years then you'll forget.....where you live!

I understand a reasonable amount of compensation but I hope we dont follow the U.S. suing culture. Air transport is safer than road transport but I dont see people suing over car accidents unless serious injury has occured, most people are too concerned about their NCD.

And for those that say 'what wrong with suing' just think it could be you on the other end for accidentally running into someone with shopping trolley, someone tripping on cracked pavement on your drive etc...where does it end:(

My wife sustained a injury in a Matalan store, all she wanted was a apology (I suggested to them a bunch of flowers would be nice as she couldn't even stand for a week) and suggested how to repair fault to stop it happening to others. Matalan denied everything (despite a witness) and surprise surprise the fault was fixed next day:tosser:
 
But was he physically injured?
Just a general comment which applies to UK courts.

Psychological damage is accepted as being just as serious as physical injuries when it comes to assessing the seriousness of an offence, which then has a direct affect on level of punishment imposed. Same thing applies when assessing compensation.

It is however much more difficult to prove. Bruises and cuts show up on photographs and are easy for a court to see. Psychological damage requires an expert report.
 
Back
Top