I needed to redo the brakes on m 500F, necessitating new backing plates to match the new drums, which are much more husky than the original rusted ones. I noticed that the stub axles differ. On the left side, the stub was drilled near the tip, and bolted into the flexible joint using a bowl shaped, 4-flanged washer that is keyed into opposing grooves in the teeth of the stub, and held into the flexible joint by a castle nut with a cotter pin through the hole. It had very little torque applied when last tightened. Is that correct? The torque spec of .36 ft/lbs seems like almost nothing. 1/3 of a ft/lb?
On the right side, the stub was not drilled for pinning; there is a key groove in the end of the axle that looks like it wants a wedge shaped key, but none was present. A conical stover nut that was tightened quite dramatically to hold the axle stub into the flexible joint. Should that be .36 ft/lbs, as well?
Thanks!
On the right side, the stub was not drilled for pinning; there is a key groove in the end of the axle that looks like it wants a wedge shaped key, but none was present. A conical stover nut that was tightened quite dramatically to hold the axle stub into the flexible joint. Should that be .36 ft/lbs, as well?
Thanks!
- Model
- 500F
- Year
- 1965
- Mileage
- 999999