...to deflect oil from tracking down the stud threads?Question, why did Fiat use dome nuts to hold the cylinder head down on the four studs inside the rocker cover?
The Haynes manual says that the purpose is, "to prevent oil leaks", (Page 28, para. 13)I wondered why you might have 4 plain nuts and 4 domed nuts. Domed nuts are usually used for appearance, to prevent contact with the threads or to prevent ingress of dirt or anything corrosive. I can't see that this would apply. So the top culprit is oil, but surely thick motor oil wouldn't get in anyway. Penetrating oil is thin oil thinned further with thinners, and that doesn't always get as far in as you'd like. But perhaps an oily thread is more likely to come loose than a dry thread, even if it is slightly oily.
After all that I've said and quoted, I strongly suspect that there is no need for the dome nuts. I can't really see how oil, that is apparently unable to seep beneath the washers, can possibly slither down a torqued head-nut.I often find myself telling people to properly read the good old Haynes Manual because there are little gems of knowledge written within. Peter has proved that I should practice what I preach as that is one fact I missed.
Having said that I did think that the oil thing was the most likely explanation but asked the question in case I had missed something.
The question arose because I am in the process of an engine build that I got as a basket case last year. All the important parts have been cleaned up and the assembly is under way. When I cleaned all the small parts and sorted through them I was surprised not to find any dome nuts. I discovered that because the cylinder head had undergone quite a heavy skim that the cylinder head studs protruded so far above the head that even with two thick washers the dome nuts would bottom out. So I have to decide, do I take an angle grinder to the studs or do I go for standard nuts and some sort of sealant on assembly?
View attachment 448402
Having built 1 or 2 extra engines in my time, I must admit to only fitting 'dome' nuts on the outer cyinder-head studs, and only for appeareance sake. On the head-studs that are covered by the rocker-cover, I used 'normal' nuts. As Peter has pointed out, if the head has been skimmed, one must take care that the 'domed' nut has not 'locked' on to the top of the stud. This problem is more noticeable with 'pattern' dome-nuts---they are not as deep internally as the genuine Fiat dome nuts. To get round this problem, I usually take just a couple of threads off the top of the head-studs prior to re-fitting them to the engine. Having 'listened' to all the comments with regard to 'oil-seepage', I must say that have never noticed this problem, and if the 'seepage' is inside the rocker-cover,one would not notice it anyway.After all that I've said and quoted, I strongly suspect that there is no need for the dome nuts. I can't really see how oil, that is apparently unable to seep beneath the washers, can possibly slither down a torqued head-nut.
If it did get down the threads, the oil wouldn't safely stay under the cover, it would track down the studs to the top of the crankcase where it would be blown through the fins on the cylinder barrels and pollute the heater air.Having built 1 or 2 extra engines in my time, I must admit to only fitting 'dome' nuts on the outer cyinder-head studs, and only for appeareance sake. On the head-studs that are covered by the rocker-cover, I used 'normal' nuts. As Peter has pointed out, if the head has been skimmed, one must take care that the 'domed' nut has not 'locked' on to the top of the stud. This problem is more noticeable with 'pattern' dome-nuts---they are not as deep internally as the genuine Fiat dome nuts. To get round this problem, I usually take just a couple of threads off the top of the head-studs prior to re-fitting them to the engine. Having 'listened' to all the comments with regard to 'oil-seepage', I must say that have never noticed this problem, and if the 'seepage' is inside the rocker-cover,one would not notice it anyway.
I often find myself telling people to properly read the good old Haynes Manual because there are little gems of knowledge written within. Peter has proved that I should practice what I preach as that is one fact I missed.
Having said that I did think that the oil thing was the most likely explanation but asked the question in case I had missed something.
The question arose because I am in the process of an engine build that I got as a basket case last year. All the important parts have been cleaned up and the assembly is under way. When I cleaned all the small parts and sorted through them I was surprised not to find any dome nuts. I discovered that because the cylinder head had undergone quite a heavy skim that the cylinder head studs protruded so far above the head that even with two thick washers the dome nuts would bottom out. So I have to decide, do I take an angle grinder to the studs or do I go for standard nuts and some sort of sealant on assembly?
View attachment 448402
I hope that your oil leak is cured by that action Ian......stud surgery? that sounds painful!Well done Peter, go to the top of the class. I have just gone through the same problem tearing my hair (what's left of it) out. Imagine the scene - engine rebuilt with modded pushrod tubes and bags of sealant all bottoned up purring away on the stand. Ha !! it's not leaking thank the lord for that - but wait what's that oozing from within the cylinders - OIL!!!! where the bl**dy hell is that coming from????? After much cursing and removal of parts the oil is weeping down two of the head studs !!!! WHAT !!! never heard of this before. So I've fitted very small 'O' rings under the thick flat washers as I don't think domed nuts will fit without stud surgery - what a faff
. I'm almost at the stage of thinking 'If it leaks now leave it and monitor the loss'
Just when you think these engines cannot surprise you any more - they do. Long term I will have to carry out stud surgery and refit domed nuts!!!!
Ian.