I have the evo channel subscribed on YouTube, and while wasting some time last night I noticed they were live broadcasting the RM Sotherbys auction. I'd seen a few of these cars in an earlier video, so I watched it for a while. After a few maseratis , Jaguars and ferraris had gone under the hammer I was surprised to see a 1965 Fiat 500...
The intro was that it had been restored in Paris and had a mobile phone controlled modern stereo hidden from view, so nothing seemingly special, yet it sold for £16,000 plus fees, so about £18,300.
http://www.rmsothebys.com/lf15/london/lots/1965-fiat-500/1076753
So out of interest I looked at the website, and reading through the text it was nothing special, but maybe there was a few people buying on a whim, and if you are there to buy a £500,000+ classic sports car, they probably haven't done their research on Fiat 500 prices. However, what I did notice is that the VIN is for a 1971 500, and it has the later 500L dash and cover, which would match the Vin. Sad I know, but in my defence, mine was manufactured in Dec 1970, hence me knowing it was a later one.
So clearly not a 1965 Fiat 500 as advertised. Could be a clerical error, but unlikely on something significant as vehicle age, so you can only assume that RM didn't do basic checks.
I'm not suggesting anything untoward by anyone one in the selling chain, but it obviously does pay to do your research when buying a classic, even from a top auction house.
cheers, Steve

The intro was that it had been restored in Paris and had a mobile phone controlled modern stereo hidden from view, so nothing seemingly special, yet it sold for £16,000 plus fees, so about £18,300.
http://www.rmsothebys.com/lf15/london/lots/1965-fiat-500/1076753
So out of interest I looked at the website, and reading through the text it was nothing special, but maybe there was a few people buying on a whim, and if you are there to buy a £500,000+ classic sports car, they probably haven't done their research on Fiat 500 prices. However, what I did notice is that the VIN is for a 1971 500, and it has the later 500L dash and cover, which would match the Vin. Sad I know, but in my defence, mine was manufactured in Dec 1970, hence me knowing it was a later one.
So clearly not a 1965 Fiat 500 as advertised. Could be a clerical error, but unlikely on something significant as vehicle age, so you can only assume that RM didn't do basic checks.
I'm not suggesting anything untoward by anyone one in the selling chain, but it obviously does pay to do your research when buying a classic, even from a top auction house.
cheers, Steve